LITIGATION INFO

Lon's Litigation Experiences   

      The litigation in Florida began for Lon in March 1989.  That litigation process was continued for 20 years, as explained herein.  He had to drive his personal car about 9,000 mile traveling to and from Florida for scheduled litigation hearings and trials - where he repeatedly had to cope with disgustingly corrupt, dishonest, unfair and unethical scheming attorneys (lawyers), multiple unfair, unethical, and corrupt trial court judges, and multiple self-serving unfair appellate court judges. 

     Lon Willoughby survived more than 20 years of extremely difficult and stressful "related litigation actions" in the state of Florida. 

     In year 1994, Lon also had to defend himself from an unfair, unethical, and corrupt County Court Judge who worked collusively with the local "state prosecutor" (called a "solicitor" in South Carolina) to punish Lon Willoughby in malicious and ruthless ways.  Why did they do that? 

     Because litigant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had courageously and responsibly used his appeal case legal briefs several times to expose and report extremely unfair, unethical, and disgustingly corrupt judicial actions against him that occurred in Putnam County Florida.

     The County Court Judge and the local state "prosecuting attorney" worked together collusively in trying to put non-resident litigant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. in the local Putnam County Jail for about nine months. 

     They collusively used a false and extremely unfair "criminal contempt of court" charge against Lon Willoughby (living in Greenville County South Carolina). 

     They then prosecuted a fraudulent conviction of that charge in the Putnam County County Court without non-resident Lon Willoughby participating in that "criminal contempt of court" trial. 

     Fortunately, defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. was able to competently appeal that "criminal contempt of court conviction" in his pro se capacity (litigating without benefit of assistance of an attorney). 

   The local Putnam County "state attorney" was represented in that unfair, unethical, and extremely corrupt County Court "criminal contempt of court" litigation by a female "assistant state prosecutor" who was as dishonest, as unfair, as unethical, and as corrupt as she could have been in that "criminal contempt of court" litigation case. 

     When defendant Lonnie Willoughby filed his appeal case about that corrupt fraudulent "criminal contempt of court" conviction, the same female "assistant state prosecutor" represented the local Putnam County "state prosecutor" in Willoughby's appeal case. 

     She continued with her unfair and unethical litigation actions throughout that appeal process.  The County Court Judge and the local state prosecutor were unfairly and unethically trying to cause non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby to be incarcerated in the local Putnam County Jail (for about nine months). 

     Defendant Lon Willoughby realized that he and wife Janie could suffer terrible financial consequences if he lost that appeal case and had to go to jail for about nine months in Putnam County, Florida. 

     If Lon was prevented from operating and managing the corporately owned ABC of Health store in Greenville County, South Carolina for a nine months period of time, the store would have been forced to close, but Lon Willoughby would have still had an active lease of the store facility which he would have still been responsible for paying monthly rent (and he would have been in jail in Putnam County, Florida and unable to manage that really bad financial situation). 

     His absence from the business for nine months would have effectively destroyed the small business, causing Lon and Janie Willoughby to lose hundreds of thousands of dollars of invested money. 

     They would have also lost a lot of invested hard work that had developed the business's credibility and reputation since Lon opened the business about five years earlier on January 4, 1999

Lon Wins His Appeal Case

     Fortunately, Appellant Willoughby won that very important appeal case against the local Putnam County "state prosecutor" by showing on appeal that the County Court Judge did not have valid "subject matter jurisdiction" to prosecute defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. about the "criminal contempt of the county court complaint" because that contempt complaint would have had to be prosecuted in the Putnam County Circuit Court (not in the Putnam County Court).  

     Appellant Lon Willoughby also showed on appeal that there had not been any criminal contempt of the circuit court - the criminal contempt of court complaint and conviction in the county court was an unfair, unethical, and corrupt fabricated complaint by the local County Court Judge and the local Putnam County state prosecutor

     Non-resident litigant Lon Willoughby had not taken any litigation action that was a contempt of any Florida court.  Those charges were totally false and were a malicious and ruthless fabrication of relevant facts

     The local Circuit Court Judge, sitting as the appellate court judge for Lon's appeal case, dismissed the "criminal contempt of the county court" complaint and dismissed the unfair, unethical, and fraudulent "criminal contempt of county court conviction" of Lonnie Willoughby.

     NOTE:  It is very important to understand that appellant Lonnie Willoughby would not have been able to accomplish an appeal case like that (in his pro se capacity) in the State of South Carolina because the Supreme Court of this state has improperly prohibited an appellant from filing an appeal case in their pro se capacity.  They are required to have a South Carolina attorney represent them in any appeal case.

     Consequently, any appeal case in this state must be represented by a licensed attorney in this state (at a cost of thousands of dollars). 

     If a litigant is not able financially or willing to spend several thousand dollars for an appeal attorney to represent their appeal case, the litigant cannot prosecute an appeal in the South Carolina Appellate Court (in Columbia, SC).  It has been this way for more than 80 years - by SC Supreme Court edict. 

     Lon Willoughby has researched that legal edict situation in depth, and he is convinced that the high court's self-serving legal edict is contrary to and in conflict with the guidance presented in the Constitution of South Carolina. 

     He has argued that issue twice in the appellate courts of South Carolina.  They simply ignored his competent legal argument issues in unfair self-serving ways.

     Lon Willoughby has reported herein two very important appeal cases that he won in the State of Florida courts proceeding pro se that he could not have won proceeding pro se in South Carolina's appellate court.  

     Lon has carefully researched this situation in South Carolina Law, and he firmly believes the SC Supreme Court's ruling about that issue is in direct conflict with the Constitution of South Carolina.  He has presented his argument issues about that very important subject to the Supreme Court of South Carolina - in a self-serving way, they simply ignored his responsible legal argument issues.

     That is one of the judicial issues that Americans 4 Justice-SC will work on improving in the future - through education of members of the South Carolina General Assembly (house and senate representatives).


Extreme Emotional Stress Over 20+ Years

      As stated previously, the Florida litigation process began for co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. in March 1989.  That litigation process was deliberately continued maliciously and ruthlessly, year after year, by Lon's Florida litigation opponents into year 2010. 

     Defendant Lonnie Willoughby did not file another appeal case in the ongoing corrupt Florida litigation process during year 2010, and that caused a termination of the litigation process.

     He had endured 20 years of extremely stressful unfair, unethical, and corrupt Florida litigation, and he realized that there was no reasonable way for him to continue the litigation process.  He had proven several times with his ten appeal cases that the Florida judicial system was extremely unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt to him. 

     Lon could not have survived all of that extreme emotional stress (during those many years of ongoing related unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt litigation actions) without his very special natural health-care and wellness concepts knowledge and his very helpful and very supportive wife (Janie). 

     Those situations are reported in more detail in the Judicial Corruption Exposed Department at our main Natural Health-care and Wellness Concepts educational website (www dot ABCofHealth dot com). 

     "Qualified visitors" will not be able to review that very important website department.  It is only accessible to A4J club members using special security codes.

Delayed Education Actions

     The litigation actions in Florida over a 20+ years period of time delayed Lon Willoughby's natural health-care education actions badly, but he was still determined to continue going forward with those very important education actions

     He realized that thousands of American adult citizens were suffering and dying prematurely weekly in the USA because they had not been educated about the vital health concepts and natural health-care concepts that Lon wanted to make available to many people.

     Lon realized that he knew how to help many American citizens live a much better life, and the fact that he had survived 20+ years of extremely unfair, unethical, malicious and ruthless litigation actions and had still managed to keep the corporate natural health store in business through all of that harassment, persecution, and extreme punishment was solid proof that he had learned a lot about how to keep a human body healthy and strong under extremely difficult conditions.

    After the Florida litigation actions ended in year 2010, Lon and wife Janie continued working together to make additional progress with Lon's natural health-care education services objectives at the ABC of Health store that was now located in Mauldin, South Carolina (the store had been moved during the days after Christmas Day in year 2009). 

     This store location was continued until April 24, 2014, when the ABC of Health store was closed permanently.  Lon finally decided that we could not compete price wise with the crushing competition from large businesses in the Greenville area (Costco, Sam's Club, Target, Vitamin Shoppe, Walmart, Whole Foods, many chain type grocery stores and many chain type pharmacy stores) plus the competition that had gradually developed on the Internet.   Amazon, and several other major Internet businesses were selling nutrition supplement products at big discount prices that we could not compete with.

     However, after the ABC of Health health store was closed permanently in Mauldin on April 24, 2014, Lon and Janie Willoughby continued working together as a dedicated and determined natural health-care and wellness concepts education team for several years   That work continuation consumed many thousands of hours of their work time because they understood that many American citizens needed Lon's special natural health-care and wellness concepts education services.  

     Lon and Janie were developing "state of the art" Internet based natural health-care and wellness concepts educational services that Lon envisioned could teach selected American adults citizens in  how to improve their lifestyle and improve and protect their natural health in very important ways that are exceptionally valuable.

     "Qualified visitors" will get introduced to those super important and valuable natural health-care concepts educational services in this Part One autobiographical educational report.


Lon and the Medical Profession

     Lon realizes that medical doctors and nurses in the USA provide a lot of beneficial medical services for millions of health-care patients each year. 

     Some of their work is done in heroic ways that is truly remarkable - using sophisticated diagnostic tests such as CAT scans, MIR tests, an Echo-cardiogram test (amazingly checks heart valve operational functions visually), and even doing some robotic surgeries remotely. 

     Some of the medical system actions have become more noticeable to the general public during the current coronavirus pandemic that is causing tremendous health problems, and more than 800,000 covid-19 deaths in the USA.  (approximately 12/13/2021)

     This tragic pandemic has also caused very serious economic problems for millions of Americans, and covid-19 has also caused very serious challenges and difficulties for school students of various age groups, including college students. 

     Many American adults realize now, more than ever before, how important front-line medical doctors and nurses, and many of their support personnel are - to citizens and other residents of the United States of America.

     Prior to Lon's pro se litigation actions, he was unfairly, unethically, and corruptly betrayed by two litigation attorneys that he retained for two separate litigation cases in the State of Florida. 

     The first attorney betrayal action was in the civil "equity court" case in Putnam County Florida during year 1989

     The second attorney betrayal action was in the following appellate court case (in 1989 - 1990).  That appeal case was supposed to report the extremely unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt trial court actions that had occurred in year 1989 against co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr

     Appellant Lonnie Willoughby's appeal case attorney deceitfully failed to report the trial court attorneys' (two opposing attorneys) extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation actions that caused co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. to lose a civil litigation case that his defense attorney should have won easily. 

     Appellant Lon Willoughby also lost that appeal case because his appeal attorney knowingly and willfully betrayed Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's litigation interest in that appeal case. 

     The attorney deceitfully failed to report on appeal the extremely unfair and unethical litigation actions that had clearly occurred against defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. in the circuit court civil litigation case below.

     Appellant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. learned that an appeal attorney will likely act to protect unfair, unethical, and disgustingly corrupt "opposing attorneys" in an appeal case - rather than honestly and ethically report and expose the unfair, unethical, and corrupt opposing attorneys' litigation actions that occurred in the trial court litigation below.

     Lon learned that judicial appeal systems are routinely corrupt in a self-serving manner; appeal attorneys are not "supposed" to honestly and ethically report (expose) in an appeal case unfair, unethical, and corrupt attorney litigation actions, schemes and tactics (in the trial court case below)

     Lon also learned that appeal attorneys are not "supposed" to fairly, honestly, and ethically report (expose) in an appeal case unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions in the trial court below (corrupt litigation actions by the trial court judge). 

     Theoretically, "officers of the court" (attorneys, lawyers, or judges) will not knowingly and willfully perpetrate those kinds of unfair, unethical, and corrupt actions during trial court litigation. 

     However, If they do perpetrate those kinds of unfair and unethical litigation actions, schemes or tactics during trial court litigation, it is not professionally polite (therefore not appropriate) for an appeal attorney to report (expose) those kinds of improper litigation actions in the abused appellant's appeal brief argument issues to the appellate panel of judges (three appellate court judges). 

     That situation illustrates the extreme level of deceit, fraud, and hypocrisy that is routinely "expected" of an appellant's appeal case attorney in a Florida appeal case process. 

     Lon's appeal case attorney conducted Lon's appeal case in compliance with those "unwritten but clearly understood self-serving appeal procedures."

     Appellant Willoughby's attorney did his loyal "attorney duty" to responsibly support the "legal profession" by deliberately failing to report the unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation "ambush complaints" scheme and tactic that caused co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. to lose the co-trustee dispute in the circuit court civil litigation below. 

     Lon's appeal case should have been easy to win - if Lon's appeal attorney had been honest and ethical about reporting on appeal the very unfair, unethical, and corrupt "ambush complaints" litigation scheme and tactic that was used by the "two opposing attorneys" who collusively "cooperated with each other" during the litigation process to willfully cause co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. to lose in the trial court litigation when he should have won that case (without any reasonable doubt). 

    Lon's appeal case attorney should have also reported in Lon's appeal brief argument issues the obviously unfair, unethical, and corrupt actions of the trial court judge below - the judge knowingly and willfully approved of and cooperated with the very unfair, unethical, and fraudulent and outrageously corrupt trial court litigation scheme and tactics used by the plaintiff's attorney during the one-day equity court trial court actions.

     At the time that Lon's appeal case was being presented to the Fifth District Court of Appeals in Daytona Beach, Florida, appellant Lon Willoughby did not realize and understand that appeal court litigation could easily be conducted in a very unfair, corrupt and fraudulent manner.

    Lon learned all of this from the way his first appeal case was conducted in 1989 - 1990.  He also learned more about the unfair, unethical, and self-serving ways that appeal cases can be adjudicated in the other seven appeal cases that Lon lost during his Florida litigation actions over a period of 20+ years. 


Lon's Pro Se Appeal Cases

     Lon Willoughby did manage to win two appellate court cases out of the nine appeal cases that he personally prosecuted, acting as his own attorney (pro se representation in those appeal cases). 

     Lon's second Florida appeal case reported (exposed) outrageously unfair, unethical, and corrupt attorney trial court actions, and also reported (exposed) unfair, unethical, corrupt, and criminal actions by a circuit court judge (who had previously been a "state prosecuting attorney"). 

     Appellant Lon Willoughby did not play by the "unwritten unfair and unethical self-serving appeal case rules" that he had learned about during his first appeal case.  He was determined to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth in his second appeal case - where he represented himself on appeal without an attorney. (pro se representation)

     He won that appeal case, where he appealed the circuit court's corrupt trial court judge's extremely unfair and unethical litigation actions against non-resident defendant litigant Lonnie Willoughby. 

     That extremely unfair and unethical and criminal judicial action was reversed by the Fifth District Court of Appeals appellate court decision. (Court in Daytona Beach, Florida.)  (Lon won that very important appeal case.)

     The second Florida appeal case that appellant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. won years later was about unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation actions by a county court judge and a female assistant state prosecuting attorney, acting collusively together as they improperly convicted non-resident defendant  Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. of "criminal contempt of the county court." 

     They collusively and corruptly used that unfair and unethical litigation process to try to put defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. in the local Putnam County jail (for about nine months). 

     NOTE:  An appeal from a County Court's Final Judgment is taken to the next court up, the local Circuit Court.  An appeal from a Circuit Court's Final Judgment in Putnam County goes to the Fifth District Court of Appeals - located in Daytona Beach, Florida.

     Appellant Lon Willoughby represented himself pro se in that circuit court appeal case, and his appeal brief argument issues responsibly reported (exposed) the extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions that had been taken against him in the county court below by the county court judge and the female assistant state prosecuting attorney

     Lon's appeal case argument issues responsibly reported (exposed) extremely unfair and corrupt judicial actions by the county court judge and the female "assistant state prosecuting attorney."

Those two "officers of the court" acted collusively with each other in an extremely unfair and unethical manner to prosecute and convict non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. of "criminal contempt of the county court" when there had not been any contempt of the county court by non-resident litigant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.   

     That criminal contempt of court prosecution case and the conviction of Lonnie Willoughby occurred through improper, unfair, and unethical corrupt prosecution actions by the local female "assistant prosecuting attorney."

        Non-resident defendant Lon Willoughby (living in South Carolina) did not get suckered into their unfair and unethical litigation scheme.  He did not travel 450 miles and foolishly participate in that improper and illegal trial court criminal contempt prosecution case.     

     Lon understood that if he traveled to Palatka, Florida in a responsible (but foolish) attempt to defend himself, he would be improperly, unfairly, and unethically convicted, and the county court judge would then have had defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. immediately arrested at the trial and incarcerated in the local Putnam County Jail. 

     In that event, defendant Willoughby would not have been able to file and prosecute pro se his appeal case about those extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions and prosecutorial actions

     Lon realized that part of their collusive unfair and unethical scheme was to try to force non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. into a litigation situation where he would need to retain a local "defense attorney" to represent him in that county court litigation case. 

     The county court judge and the "assistant state prosecuting attorney" were trying to force defendant Lonnie Willoughby to have to spend several thousand dollars to retain a local defense attorney to represent him in the "criminal contempt of court" litigation case. 

     They knew that the local "defense attorney" would likely "go along to get along with their litigation scheme" and defendant Lonnie Willoughby would be convicted and then promptly arrested and incarcerated in the Putnam County Jail (for about nine months).  

   Prior to that trial and fraudulent conviction, defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. timely filed a Motion to Dismiss their unfair and unethical complaint against him.  That motion explained the reasons why the improper litigation case should be dismissed.

     The county court judge summarily denied Lon's motion and then proceeded to schedule a trial, where Lon was later convicted of the "criminal contempt of the county court complaint" even though Willoughby did not attend and participate in that criminal case trial.

     Defendant Willoughby wisely did not travel 450 miles to Putnam County and participate in that trial.  He did not spend thousands of dollars to retain a local "defense attorney" to represent him in that unfair and unethical litigation case.  However, Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. did timely initiate an appeal litigation case about that criminal case conviction.

      Defendant Willoughby also did not spend thousands of dollars to retain a local Putnam County attorney to represent him in that appeal case because he had already learned that he could not trust any Florida attorney to represent him in an appeal case.

     Lon also realized that he had already learned how to present his own appeal case, proceeding in his pro se capacity (without attorney assistance), so he had already planned to appeal any conviction that occurred in that case. 

     Appellant Willoughby then presented his entire appeal case without traveling to Florida by using the U.S. Mail system to communicate with the local Putnam County Clerk of Court and his involved staff members. 

     Lon timely filed his Notice of Appeal, paid both of the county court and circuit court appeal filing fees to the Clerk of Court, and he instructed the Clerk of Court personnel about preparing the "Record on Appeal" (Lon's selection of evidential documents from within the official litigation record in the county court's "criminal contempt of court case"). 

     Lon Willoughby then used the USPS mail system to pay the bill for the preparation of that "Record on Appeal" and Lon then had the Clerk of Court personnel process and present all of Willoughby's appeal case documents for his appeal case to the local Putnam County Circuit Court (where his appeal case would be conducted).

        Appellant Willoughby's appeal legal brief reported that the county court judge did not have "subject matter jurisdiction" of the criminal contempt of court complaint issue that Lon Willoughby had been improperly prosecuted for and convicted of as a non-resident defendant (Lon lived  in South Carolina). 

     "Subject matter jurisdiction" of that alleged criminal contempt of court complaint issue was in the circuit court, not in the county court.  It was improper for the county court judge to prosecute defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. for that alleged "criminal contempt of court" complaint

     Appellant Willoughby's appeal brief argument issues also reported that there had not been any "criminal contempt of court" - of either court (the county court or the circuit court).

     Lon's appeal legal brief also reported that the criminal contempt of court complaint was an unfair and unethical illegal fabricated complaint about an issue that was not a contempt of the county court or the circuit court.


Appellate Court Process

     The circuit court judge, sitting as a single appellate court judge, recognized that appellant Willoughby's legal arguments on appeal were correct, and he ruled in appellant Willoughby's favor by dismissing the criminal contempt of court conviction of defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. 

     That extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt trial court litigation process shows that Florida judicial actions and Florida "state prosecutor actions" can be outrageously unfair, unethical, and corrupt.    

     The county court judge and the "assistant prosecuting attorney" had willfully and wantonly tried to wreak Lon Willoughby's life by putting him in the Putnam County Jail for nine months (when they knew, or should have known that he had not done anything that was a criminal contempt of court - of any Florida court). 

     Those unfair and unethical litigation actions would have destroyed the corporate health store business in Greenville, South Carolina that Lon and Janie had invested their lifetime savings in (hundreds of thousands of dollars).  Lon had also worked in that business since January 4, 1999, typically working 80 to 90 hours weekly to help develop that new business.

     That Florida county court litigation case would have also caused Mrs. Diane Owen (Lon's assistant store manager), to lose her job. 

     That Florida litigation case would have also caused several hundred health store customers to lose the very important natural health-care assistance that the health store had been providing in a competent and responsible manner for several years.  


Punishment for Corrupt Litigation

     What should have happened to those two corrupt "officers of the court."  (The county court judge and the assistant state attorney.)  The improper litigation actions that the county court judge and the assistant state prosecutor attorney unfairly, unethically, and corruptly took against non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby was so bad and so extremely fraudulent that the county court judge should have been removed as a judge, and he should have had his license to practice law in Florida revoked permanently. 

     The "assistance prosecuting attorney" should have also been removed from her position, and she should have had her license to practice law in the state of Florida revoked permanently. 

     So what kind of disciplinary actions were taken against those two extremely corrupt despotic and tyrannical Florida government employees? 

     No punishment of any type was made to the extremely corrupt county court judge or to the extremely corrupt "assistant prosecuting attorney."  No responsible effort was made to punish either one of those "officers of the court" in any manner.      

     They did not even get a written reprimand (a slap on the hand).

     They probably laughed all the way to the bank as they cashed their next salaried Florida pay check.

     Lon Willoughby has learned that such unfair and unethical and outrageously corrupt judicial actions can happen any time the local judge (county court judge or circuit court judge) and the local "state prosecuting attorney" collusively choose to litigate in that outrageously unfair and corrupt manner

     Nothing stops them from those outrageously corrupt judicial and prosecution actions because they already know that there will not be any responsible investigation and therefore no punishment of any type for their outrageously unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation actions. 

     As shown with Lon Willoughby's appeal case, extremely corrupt judicial litigation actions and/or extremely corrupt litigation actions by a "state prosecuting attorney" will not be investigated and prosecuted - even when they are clearly exposed during an appeal case, as exposed by appellant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. during his circuit court appeal case.

     Fortunately, non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby had learned enough about litigation actions and litigation procedures that he was able to defend himself on appeal, in his pro se capacity, from those extremely unfair and unethical and outrageously corrupt litigation actions. 

     As reported previously herein, Lon Willoughby had also defended himself successfully in a previous Florida appellate court case when he won his appeal case against an unfair, unethical, and disgustingly corrupt circuit court judge (who had previously been a state prosecuting attorney).

     Lon Willoughby's appeal briefs for that appeal, and the Record on Appeal, proved conclusively that the circuit court judge had knowingly and willfully issued an extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt "summary judgment order" that was extremely detrimental to litigant Lonnie Willoughby (living in South Carolina). 

     The corrupt circuit court judge had knowingly and willfully tried to totally destroy Willoughby's very valid strong counterclaim case of "deceit, fraud and legal malpractice" against the local attorney and his law firm that was involved in that extremely unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt "summary judgment order."

     That corrupt judicial order had improperly ruled in favor of an extremely dishonest and corrupt attorney that had previously betrayed co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. in trial court litigation in that same county (Putnam County) in September 1989.

     That judicial situation shows how extremely corrupt a Florida litigation case can be, even when conducted by a circuit court judge who had previously been a Florida state prosecuting attorney before he was elected as a circuit court judge.

     Co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby has previously reported herein that he lost his first Florida appeal case in 1989-1990 (about that same attorney's betrayal of co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby during a one-day civil action trial by deceit, fraud, and legal malpractice). 

     As previously reported herein, Appellant Lonnie Willoughby lost that appeal case because the appeal case attorney (that appellant Lonnie  Willoughby, Jr. had retained to present that appeal case) knowingly and willfully betrayed appellant Lonnie Willoughby litigation interest in that appeal case. 

     The appeal attorney knowingly and willfully caused Appellant Willoughby to lose his appeal case when Lon's appeal attorney "cooperated" with the opposing party's attorney to deceitfully cause appellant Willoughby to lose that appeal case. 

     Lon's appeal case attorney failed to expose the extremely unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt judicial actions that had occurred in the trial court below that were extremely unfair and unreasonable to co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.

    Lon's appeal case attorney willfully chose to collusively "cooperate" with the unfair, dishonest, unethical collusive "ambush complaints" scheme and tactic that had been used against co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby by the plaintiff's attorney in the circuit court trial below. 

     Co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby's defense attorney for that trial court case had more than twenty years experience in Florida litigation when he knowingly and willfully "allowed" five "ambush complaints" to be presented by the plaintiff's attorney during a one-day "equity court" (non-jury) trial without making proper objections to those surprise "ambush" complaint issues.  

     Those unfair and unethical and illegal "ambush complaints litigation tactics" occurred when the plaintiff's attorney and the "defense attorney" (defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby's "defense attorney") collusively "cooperated" with each other during the litigation process to cause an extremely unfair, unethical, and fraudulent outcome for the Final Judgment rendered in that trial court case.

     Those extremely unfair, unethical, and fraudulent trial court actions were successful because the presiding circuit court judge had knowingly and willfully "cooperated" with the plaintiff's attorney's improper and illegal "ambush complaints" litigation scheme and tactic at trial.

     The extremely unfair and unethical circuit court judge who presided over that one-day equity court (non-jury) trial on September 8, 1989 was extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt.

     That was shown clearly in the FINAL JUDGMENT rendered for that case - where the judge ruled against defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. on three of the five surprise "ambush complaints" that were introduced for the first time after the one-day trial had started. 

     Those litigation tactics were an extreme denial of "due process of law standards" in Florida courts, and the circuit court judge surely knew that.

     As reported previously herein, Appellant Lon Willoughby lost his appeal case about those outrageously corrupt litigation actions because his appeal case attorney betrayed appellant Lonnie Willoughby in the appeal argument issues presented for that appeal.

     Appellant Willoughby's appeal case attorney knowingly and willfully failed to honestly and responsibly report in Lon Willoughby's appeal case argument issues the rather obvious unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation actions that occurred in the circuit court "equity court" trial litigation below. 

     That appeal case showed Lon how disgustingly unfair and corrupt, in self-serving judicial ways, the appeal process can be. 

     Lon's appeal case attorney could have easily won that appeal case, but he deliberately failed to report the extremely unfair and unethical litigation scheme and tactics used in the trial court below to defeat a very competent and very responsible co-trustee (Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.).


Lon's other Florida Appeal Cases

     Lon Willoughby filed and prosecuted pro se seven other Florida appeal cases in the Fifth District Court of Appeals.  The appeal court judges (three judge panel) ruled against him in each of those appeal cases, and the appellate court judges refused to write a judicial opinion (decision) for each of those cases.

     They refused to state (explain) why Willoughby's appeal arguments were not approved (there was no valid legal basis for the three appeal judges to disapprove his appeal argument issues).

     If the three appellate court judges that ruled on each of appellant Willoughby's other seven appeals in the Florida appellate court had been fair, honest, and ethical judges, Lon would have won each of those seven appeal cases.

     It is a lot of difficult legal work and a lot of expense for an appellant to prosecute an appeal case.  Consequently, a sensible appellant will not attempt to prosecute an appeal case unless he/she has strong appellate court case arguments and has supporting documentary evidence in the official litigation records for the trial court case to present to the three appellate court judges in the appeal case Record on Appeal

     Lon Willoughby has learned that appellate court judges are generally "elitist" who can rule against an appellant any time they choose to do so, without having to state why they did not agree with and approve of the appellant's appeal argument issues. 

     In subsequent appeal litigation, Lon Willoughby learned that there is nothing practical that a losing appellant can do about an extremely unfair and unreasonable appellate court appeal case decision.  They can be as unfair and unethical and corrupt as they choose to be, knowing that the abused appellant cannot do anything practical about their unfair and unethical self-serving ruling.

     The losing appellant can only appeal one of those appellate court decisions to the Supreme Court of the United States, and Lon did that twice. 

     Those two appeal cases taught Lon Willoughby that it is a lot of appeal litigation work (hundreds of hours) and a lot of expense (thousands of dollars in attorney fees unless one proceeds pro se) to complete one of those very difficult appeal cases. 

    The appeal case legal brief has to be published in a small book format, about 6" by 9" in size, with printing on both sides of the page with a limited number of small pages, where everything in the appeal brief must be retyped without using a small font, and no photocopies of anything are allowed in the appeal brief.  

     Therefore, all evidential orders from the trial court litigation and the appellate court litigation below, and all other evidential documents submitted in the appeal brief, and all official transcript records must be retyped to fit into that small book format. The appellate must have the appeal brief "book" printed, and then send the high court 40 copies of that appeal brief "book." 

     Lon went though that ridiculously unreasonable laborious typing and publishing process twice before he learned that the chances of getting the nine justices of the high court to responsibly review one of those appeal cases is less than one thousandth of one percent (1/1000%).   He will never do that again, under any conceivable circumstances.

     Lon Willoughby litigated over a period of 20+ years in the Florida trial courts and appellate courts.  That caused more than 17,000+ hours of litigation work for Lon Willoughby - which is equivalent to more than seven years of work at 40 hours per week for his Florida litigation work.

    Lonnie Willoughby has zero confidence in the fairness and honesty of Florida trial court attorneys, or Florida trial court judges, or Florida appeal case attorneys, or Florida's state prosecuting attorneys, and he has very little confidence in Florida appellate court judges.

     Lon also learned that trying to get the nine justices of the U.S. Supreme Court to render a responsible review of an unfair and unethical civil action appeal case decision (in a state court appeal case or in a federal case appeal case) is almost always a waste of time and effort.


Summary of Lon's Litigation Experiences

     Lon Willoughby learned that in most situations, members of the legal profession in Florida (and likely in other USA states) will act in any self-serving way feasible to try to make the legal profession look good, even when members of the legal profession have proceeded during trial court litigation in conniving, scheming, extremely unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt ways. 

     Lon Willoughby has concluded that the whole litigation process in American courts will usually be conducted in unfair, unethical, and corrupt self-serving ways that provide substantial benefits to members of the local area legal profession - whenever such self-serving benefits can be obtained in a litigation process.

     Attorneys (lawyers) and judges know they can get away with such unfair, unethical litigation tactics because there will not be a fair and responsible investigation, prosecution, and punishment system for attorneys and judges when they conduct litigation actions using unfair, unethical, deceitful, and fraudulent tactics. 

     Those investigative and prosecution actions are controlled by members of the legal profession, and litigant Lon Willoughby found that they will likely look out for and take care of members of the legal profession in a self-serving manner, as shown in the litigation examples reported herein.

      Lon Willoughby's litigation experiences in Florida courts were continued over 20+ years to punish him in malicious and ruthless ways because he had the naive audacity to object to and appeal the extremely unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt manner in which he had been treated during his first trial on September 8, 1989

     He had no idea during his first appeal case (November - December 1989) regarding those outrageously corrupt judicial actions that the Florida judicial system was a self-serving criminal enterprise.

     Think about the outrageous level of judicial corruption that appellant Lonnie Willoughby reported (exposed) in the two appeal cases that are reported above.

     "Qualified visitors" can now understand why Lon Willoughby considers the litigation systems in Florida to be highly developed forms of self-serving organized crime against gullible and naive trusting brain-washed citizens.

     For the most part, Lon found that the judicial systems in Florida are usually a big, massive, corrupt fraud upon the public at large.

     If the litigation system is that unfair, unethical, and corrupt, why was Lonnie Willoughby able to win two appeals cases out of ten appeal cases?

     He won two appeal cases because his appeal argument issues were so clear and so valid and so strongly supported by the official litigation records (the Record on Appeal) and so strongly supported by the relevant controlling legal standards that it left the appellate court with no reasonable viable choice except to rule in appellant Willoughby's favor. 

     That occurred in two of Lon's appeal cases where the appellate court needed to write a legal opinion for the appeal case. 

     Could the appellate court have ruled against appellant Willoughby even in those circumstances?

     Yes, they could have caused an extremely unfair and unethical and corrupt appeal decision for each of Lon's appeal cases - because they can literally do anything they want to do and likely get away with it

     Fortunately, the appellate court chose to not render an outrageously corrupt written appeal decision for each of those appeal cases. 

      "Qualified visitors" can see clearly from these two appeal cases why it is very smart to avoid travel into any state in the United States of America that one does not permanently reside within. 


Lon's Litigation Actions in South Carolina

      Lon Willoughby has also had important litigation experiences in the state of South Carolina.  Those litigation experiences taught him that litigation in this state can also be extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt.  He learned that it is extremely difficult for a litigant to do anything meaningful about unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation actions in the State of South Carolina. 

     Lon learned that it can also be very dangerous to travel into other counties within this state because of those potential litigation situations. 

     He has had less experience litigating in South Carolina courts, but the limited experience that he has obtained has shown him that South Carolina trial courts can also easily operate in unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt ways that are self-serving for the legal profession

     That situation is especially true with regard to the appeal processes in this state.  The appeal process in this state is even worse than Florida because an appellant is not allowed to present any argument on appeal in a pro se manner.  The appellant is required to have an attorney represent any appeal argument issues because no pro se argument is allowed for appeal court cases

Our Judicial Corruption Exposed Department

     Members of Americans 4 Justice-SC can read about some of Lon Willoughby's other challenging litigation experiences at our main Natural Health-care and Wellness Concepts educational website in the Judicial Corruption Exposed Department.  That special department is only available for review by  members of our A4J private education club.

     Lon has presented herein very important education about judicial systems in America - education that every competent responsible patriotic-minded American adult citizen needs to learn about. 

     Unfortunately, Lon must limit our promotion of this vital education to selected upstate South Carolina ZIP Code areas, as explained previously - for the multiple reasons that are explained herein.



Overview Summary of
Our Natural Healthcare Services

     IMPORTANT NOTE:  The introductory paragraphs below provide a summary of the very important and valuable natural healthcare education services that ABC of Health offers to "qualifiable" American adult citizens.

     This same summary is presented in some other departments because key words are contained herein that help Internet Search Engines work better with this website.

     After you have reviewed this helpful summarized information one time, you can simply scroll down past this  overview summary when you review other departments that contain this same summarized information.

     Natural Health Education Services: Two of our education websites contain special natural health concepts that are "free to review" for "qualified visitors" as explained in this website.  They can also help apparently "qualified visitors" learn about this special introductory education website.  This website can help apparently "qualified visitors"  understand why it is very important to improve their lifestyles (enjoy a better and longer life) 

     However, in order to begin using some of our copyrighted natural healthcare concepts, "qualified visitors" must agree to comply responsibly with the Conditions stated in our Copyright Information Department and the Conditions stated in our Terms of Use Department - as published at our main Natural Health-care and Wellness Concepts educational website (www dot ABCofHealth dot com/)

     Our company also offers Natural Health-care and Wellness Concepts Consultation Services with Lon Willoughby by telephone for A4J club members (live in the upstate area of South Carolina - within an approximate 60 miles radius of downtown Greenville) 

     We have a very reasonable fee structure for these Natural Health-care and Wellness Concepts Consultation Services.

     Lon can conduct convenient consultations by telephone that may be very helpful to A4J club member individuals, or married couples, or families (with children living at home with their parents).

     Lon suggests that all consultations be conducted with a landline type telephone connection if possible - to avoid cell phone type radiation into the very sensitive  head area for an extended period of time.  That radiation can be damaging to ear, eye, and brain tissue.

     If there are teenage children in a family, and a landline telephone with speakerphone capability is available for use, it may be important to include the older children in the family telephone consultation session

    Lon Willoughby can structure the telephone consultation to also be very beneficial to teenage children, in addition to the consultation information that is provided for direct benefit to the parents (This depends upon the personal sensitivity of the healthcare information that will likely be involved in the consultation session).

     Our telephone consultations can quickly inform A4J club members about how Lon Willoughby can help with some very important natural healthcare concepts issues.

     Telephone consultation services offer the advantages of being a fast and convenient way for A4J club members to learn about some specific alternative health type natural healthcare and wellness concepts that can be helpful for specific healthcare concerns and issues

     This very convenient consultation opportunity can enable A4J club members to quickly obtain very valuable natural healthcare concepts information at a very reasonable cost.

     The copyrighted Advanced Natural Healthcare and Wellness Concepts that we teach in our six-lessons A4J Natural Healthcare and Wellness Concepts Educational Services will educate our A4J club members about some very important and very valuable advanced level natural healthcare and wellness concepts

    Lon knows how to teach these special natural healthcare concepts in a manner that is easy for A4J club members to understand and easy to learn, and our natural healthcare and wellness concepts will be easy to use in achieving very important improvements in the personal lifestyle of A4J club members.

     These remarkable natural healthcare improvements can benefit A4J club members in very important ways.  Our special copyrighted education can enable A4J club members to live more enjoyable lives that will likely have more productivity and more achievements and more success than they would have likely had with their previous diet and lifestyle.

     Our incredibly important and valuable six-lessons A4J Natural Healthcare and Wellness Concepts Home-study Education Services are available only from our company because ABC of Health owns numerous copyrights for special healthcare concepts that are presented in the natural healthcare and wellness concepts education services that we teach.

     We are the only company authorized to teach our healthcare education services because we must control the security evaluation of each applicant's qualifications for joining our Patriotic A4J Private Education Club.

     Our main Natural Healthcare and Wellness Concepts education website educates our A4J club members about very important natural healthcare and wellness concepts that are involved with a broad variety of healthcare subjects such as:

healthcare consultations, healthcare classes, healthcare concepts education programs, herbs, enzymes, minerals, nutraceuticals, probiotics, proteins, vitamins (food derived and manufactured), etc 

     Lon Willoughby also present important education about: air filters, air purifiers, water filters, bathing water filters, bath tub filters, shower filters, water purifiers, water alkalizers, water ionizers, CHI styled exercisers, quality built rebounder exercisers, and Far-infrared (FIR) portable Saunas.

     The relevant natural healthcare products and services listed above illustrate the broad range of important healthcare issues that our resident natural healthcare consultant and nutrition consultant and healthy lifestyle consultant is knowledgeable about (Lon Willoughby)    

      Lon has acquired special advanced natural healthcare and wellness concepts education and experiences with many important health-promoting products and alternative health and "complementary health" type natural healthcare concepts and services.

Natural healthcare actions = healthcare actions

without using pharmaceutical type drugs.



Helpful Information For You

     This website is viewed best with Arial font - Medium Size (10)

     You may be able to select parameters on your browser by using View (set text size) and Tools (Internet Options - select Font and then select the Font Size) 

     Our Contact ABC of Health department provides a convenient E-mail Form that makes it easy to send a quick E-mail communications to ABC of HealthPlease title your Subject line as suggested therein.

+  +  +  +  + 

      If you are a "qualified visitor" with  ABC of Health and you appreciate the very important and valuable copyrighted and proprietary natural health-care and wellness concepts education services that are presented "free to review" at this website, it will be helpful to us if you will take a few minutes to send us an E-mail that tells us how our "free to review" health-care and wellness concepts education services have been helpful to you

    Lon wants to know how you feel about the very important health-care concepts education introduced at this website.  He really does like to hear from "qualified visitors." 

    IMPORTANT E-MAIL INFO:  If you want to retain a copy of your E-mail, just use your usual method of sending E-mails and send your E-mail to:


ABCofHealth@live.com 


    You will then retain a copy of your E-mail in your E-mail  Sent Folder; you can also send yourself a Cc (carbon) copy

     If you prefer more convenience, you can visit our Contact ABC of Health Department and use our convenient E-mail form to send your E-mail, but you will not retain a personal copy of that E-mail.  

     Your E-mail to us can simply express how you feel about our dedicated efforts to help "qualified visitors" learn about some very important and very valuable natural health-care concepts.  Our education can help them be more responsible about taking better care of their precious natural health. They may benefit from those vital health-care actions for the rest of their life.

    If you have been a customer or client in our  unique Health and Wellness Store or our Natural Health-care Concepts Education Business, it will be helpful to us if you will take a few minutes to express your feelings about the way ABC of Health has served your natural health-care concerns and interests. 

   NOTE:  If you want to retain a copy of your E-mail, please use the alternate E-mail procedure that was explained above (use your usual E-mail system)

    Your constructive comments about us can be very helpful to first-time "qualified visitors" who are trying to evaluate our credibility and trust-worthiness as a competent and responsible natural health-care and wellness concepts educator.

  

Additional E-Mail Information


     When we respond to your E-mail, our response may go into your "Junk E-mail or Spam E-mail File" until you direct your E-mail system to recognize our E-mail as a good E-mail and then begin presenting our E-mails in your E-mail Inbox.

      It is very important to always check your "E-mail Junk File and your E-mail Spam File" each time you check your E-mail to help you avoid losing some good E-mails. 

     We check our E-mail Junk File and Spam File daily, and we frequently have some good E-mails that got sent to one of those files instead of being sent to our E-mail Inbox 

     We understand that E-mails that get stored in our E-mail Junk File or our E-mail Spam File will be deleted automatically after ten days of storage (if we have not taken actions to move any good E-mails into our E-mail Inbox before the 10-day period expires for each individual E-mail)

     When we find important E-mails in our E-mail Junk File or Spam File, as we frequently do, we simple move them into our E-mail inbox.  

     We do that easily by selecting the three dot icon (or three line icon) at the top right of the display screen and then select the "move" function in the listing of actions that appear vertically.   We routinely move those good Emails to our E-mail
Inbox.


| Home | Home Extension Dept. | Marketing Info |

| About ABC of Health | Contact ABC of Health and Map |


Copyright (c) 2018 - 2022

All rights reserved.

This department was updated

on June 2, 2022